DEMONSTRATION ONLY: This demonstration presents an abbreviated version of the complete MTEL course. Click 'Next' at the bottom of the screen or make a selection from the links on the left to begin. Not all links are available for the demo.
0011 Demonstrate the Ability to Prepare An Effective Summary
Guidelines for Passing
Your summary response will be rated on a four-point scale. The four points of the scale correspond to varying degrees of performance that are related to the performance characteristics. The table below provides guidelines as to how each summary assignment will be scored.
Writing Summary Score Scale |
Score |
Score Point Description |
4 |
A well-formed written response.
- Using his or her own words, the candidate accurately conveys the writer's main ideas and maintains focus and unity.
- The candidate's response is concise, but provides enough statements of appropriate depth and specificity to convey the writer's main points.
- The response exhibits control and organization.
- The candidate uses correct and effective sentence structure.
- The candidate's usage and choice of words are careful and precise.
- The candidate shows mastery of mechanical conventions (i.e., spelling, punctuation, and capitalization).
|
|
3 |
An adequately formed written response.
- Generally using his or her own words, the candidate accurately conveys most of the writer's main ideas and generally maintains focus and unity
- The candidate's response may be too long or too short, but generally provides enough statements of appropriate depth and specificity to convey most of the writer's main points
- The candidate's organization of ideas may be ambiguous, incomplete, or partially ineffective
- The candidate uses adequate sentence structure, but minor errors may be present
- The candidate's usage and choice of words display minor errors
- The candidate makes some errors in the use of mechanical conventions (i.e., spelling, punctuation, and capitalization).
|
|
2 |
A partially formed written response.
- The candidate conveys only some of the writer's main ideas and/or does not sustain the focus and unity of the discussion. The candidate relies heavily on the writer's words.
- The candidate's response is too long or too short and/or includes few statements that contribute effectively to the development of the response
- The candidate may make an effort to organize and sequence ideas, but organization is largely unclear
- Sentence structure is poor, with noticeable and distracting errors
- Imprecision in usage and word choice is distracting
- The candidate makes frequent errors in the use of mechanical conventions (i.e., spelling, punctuation, and capitalization).
|
|
1 |
An inadequately formed written response.
- The writer's main ideas are not identified
- The candidate fails to include statements that would contribute to the effective development of the response
- Any organization that is present fails to present an effective sequence of ideas
- Sentence structure is ineffective, and few sentences are free of errors
- Imprecision in usage and word choice interferes with meaning
- The candidate makes serious and numerous errors in the use of mechanical conventions (i.e., spelling, punctuation, and capitalization).
|
|
U |
The response is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, primarily in a language other than English, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the assignment. |
|
B |
There is no response to the assignment. |
|